InsightsRotationNovember 11, 20262 min read

Is the High-⁠Beta Run Over?

More stocks are moving against the market than at any time on record, including the dot-⁠com bust. After the last extreme like this, the riskiest stocks lost half their value, and a similar turn may already be underway.

More than a quarter of the S&P 500 is now moving against the market. A recent paper by Kailash Concepts found that a record 27% of the index’s stocks have a negative six-⁠month beta. From 1989 through 2023, that share averaged less than 1%. The previous high, 17%, was set in early 2001 as the tech bubble burst.

Of all the extremes in today’s market, this is one of the most troubling. Beta measures how much a stock moves with the market: a reading of 1 means in step, and a negative reading means the opposite way. The typical stock no longer tracks the index. The median beta is 0.42, against a long-⁠term reading of 0.97.

The market has split in two

Below the surface, stocks in the lowest-⁠beta quintile of the S&P 500 now move against the market, and the group’s beta is -0.51. The highest-⁠beta quintile moves about twice as much as the index. The beta gap between the highest- and lowest-⁠beta quintiles is 2.6, the widest on record and nearly three times its level at the March 2000 market peak.

Sky-⁠high hopes, near-⁠record prices

The high-⁠beta group also carries historic expectations. Analysts expect high-⁠beta stocks to grow earnings by 35% a year, more than double the group’s long-⁠run median forecast of 15.4%. In the past, such high expectations led to negative returns for high-⁠beta shares. Investors are paying about 7 times sales for these companies, just below the most expensive level in history. That premium is a sharp break from longer-⁠term norms. From 2010 through 2022, high-⁠beta stocks traded at or below the valuation of low-⁠beta stocks about half the time.

History favors the calmer stocks

The last extreme of this kind, the dot-⁠com bubble, ended badly for high beta. In the five years after August 2000, high-⁠beta stocks lost 50%, while low-⁠beta stocks gained 21%.

After the dot-⁠com bubble, high-⁠beta stocks fell hard and stayed down
Return from August 31, 2000
High beta, 1 year later-57%Low beta, 1 year later+2%High beta, 5 years later-50%Low beta, 5 years later+21%
After the dot-⁠com bubble, high-⁠beta stocks fell hard and stayed down
Return from August 31, 2000
High beta, 1 year later-57%Low beta, 1 year later+2%High beta, 5 years later-50%Low beta, 5 years later+21%
After the dot-⁠com bubble, high-⁠beta stocks fell hard and stayed down
Return from August 31, 2000
High beta, 1 year later-57%Low beta, 1 year later+2%High beta, 5 years later-50%Low beta, 5 years later+21%
High beta and low beta: the quintile (fifth) of S&P 500 stocks with the highest beta and the quintile with the lowest. Source: Kailash Concepts (Kailash Capital Research), data from August 31, 2000 to August 31, 2005. Redrawn by Flextion.
By the numbers
2.6

The beta gap between the highest- and lowest-⁠beta quintiles is 2.6, the widest on record and nearly three times its level at the March 2000 market peak.

35%

Analysts expect high-⁠beta stocks to grow earnings by 35% a year, more than double the group’s long-⁠run median forecast of 15.4%.

The pattern is not limited to bubbles. Academic researchers have documented the “low-⁠beta anomaly”: over time, less volatile stocks have outperformed high-⁠beta stocks. This is attributed to the superior quality, dividend and valuation characteristics of lower-⁠beta companies.

The turn may have started

The gap between high and low beta opened only in the past year and a half. Two funds show it. The Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF (SPHB) holds the S&P 500’s highest-⁠beta stocks. The AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-⁠Beta ETF (BTAL) does the reverse: it buys low-⁠beta stocks and bets against high-⁠beta stocks.

Until about May 2025, the two traded in line with each other. Then the AI-⁠driven rally accelerated, and high beta pulled far ahead. By its October 6 peak, the high-⁠beta fund was up 78% from May 2025.

Over the past month, that trend has reversed: high-⁠beta stocks fell 13% and the anti-⁠beta fund rose about 10%. Even so, as of November 10, 2026, high-⁠beta stocks remain up 52% since May 2025, while the anti-⁠beta fund is still down 31%.

High beta soared, then turned
Price change since May 30, 2025
-40%-20%0%20%40%60%80%Jul 2025Oct 2025Jan 2026Apr 2026Jul 2026Oct 2026Peak +78%, Oct 6+52%-31%High-⁠beta stocks (SPHB)Anti-⁠beta fund (BTAL)
High beta soared, then turned
Price change since May 30, 2025
-40%-20%0%20%40%60%80%Jul 2025Oct 2025Jan 2026Apr 2026Jul 2026Oct 2026Peak +78%, Oct 6+52%-31%High-⁠beta stocks (SPHB)Anti-⁠beta fund (BTAL)
High beta soared, then turned
Price change since May 30, 2025
-40%-20%0%20%40%60%80%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026Peak +78%, Oct 6+52%-31%High-⁠beta stocks (SPHB)Anti-⁠beta fund (BTAL)
The anti-⁠beta fund (BTAL) buys low-⁠beta stocks and bets against high-⁠beta stocks. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Source: Flextion, from daily closing prices, May 30, 2025 to November 10, 2026.

One way to position for it

One of the most powerful mean-⁠reversion dynamics in the market may have begun, as the gap between high-⁠beta and low-⁠beta performance narrows. A strategy such as the AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-⁠Beta ETF (BTAL) could be an effective way to shift away from high-⁠beta exposure and gain from a broad rotation into less volatile, higher-⁠quality companies.

How Flextion rates BTAL

BTALAGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-⁠Beta ETFOutperform

Flextion rating as of November 11, 2026. A rating is our view of how a fund will do against its benchmark over the next 12 months.

PE
Paul EhrlichmanCEO & CIO, Flextion

Views are the author’s as of November 11, 2026 and are not investment advice.

See which managers Flextion expects to outperform, and which to avoid.

Request a Demo